- +370 668 00 113
- hello@tobalt.eu
Get independent support to define requirements, assess bidders and choose IT suppliers that meet your organisation’s operational, accessibility, security and compliance needs.
If your specification is too broad, inconsistent or open to interpretation, suppliers may price different solutions against the same tender. That makes bids difficult to compare and increases the risk of disputes, change requests and unmet expectations after award.
Supplier responses often sound compliant on paper while hiding important limitations around integrations, data portability, accessibility, security responsibilities or multilingual content management. Without independent review, these gaps may only emerge during delivery.
A system may appear cost-effective at award stage but create long-term dependency through restrictive licensing, limited export options, proprietary workflows or expensive support arrangements. This can make future re-procurement slow, costly and risky.
If WCAG 2.1 AA, GDPR, records management, hosting expectations or governance responsibilities are not defined and evaluated properly during procurement, you may appoint a supplier that cannot support your legal and operational obligations without major revisions.
We help you turn operational needs into clear procurement requirements that suppliers can respond to consistently. This includes user needs, service scope, accessibility expectations, multilingual content handling, data protection responsibilities, integration needs and acceptance criteria.
We help you assess supplier submissions against published criteria, test whether proposed approaches are credible and identify where responses are incomplete, overstated or likely to create delivery risk. Your team gets a more robust basis for moderation and award decisions.
We compare bidders beyond headline price, looking at maintainability, service continuity, data portability, governance model, accessibility capability, multilingual delivery approach and the practical effort your organisation would need to manage the supplier successfully.
We identify commercial, operational and technical risks before you commit, including lock-in risks, unrealistic delivery assumptions, unclear responsibilities, weak exit arrangements and hidden dependencies on specific tools, licences or subcontractors.
We help you strengthen tender and contract documentation so that supplier obligations are clear, measurable and aligned with public sector requirements. This includes service levels, accessibility conformance, GDPR roles, documentation expectations, knowledge transfer and exit provisions.
Yes. We provide independent advisory support to help you define requirements, review submissions and document technical reasoning, but we do not bid for the contracts we advise on. That separation helps your organisation maintain a defensible and impartial procurement process.
Yes. We help you translate accessibility and data protection obligations into clear procurement requirements and evaluation points. We also review supplier responses for evidence, limitations and delivery risks, so you are not relying on generic compliance statements alone.
Ideally, before the tender is published, when requirements, evaluation criteria and contract terms can still be improved. However, we can also support during clarification, bid evaluation or pre-award review if you need independent technical input at a later stage.
Yes. We review both the proposed solution and the contract position to identify dependency risks such as restrictive licensing, weak exit clauses, limited data export, poor documentation commitments or unclear handover responsibilities. We then help you strengthen requirements and terms before award where possible.
